Jump to content

 

- - - - -

Honda Seeley Sprockets


  • You cannot reply to this topic
9 replies to this topic

#1 honda pants

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 218 posts
  • Bike:Tiger Cub

Posted 24 October 2006 - 10:21 PM

Can anyone suggest the best combination of front and rear sprocket to suit the 200 seeley, :chairfall: 520 chain size.
And who does the fork seals ta!

#2 Woody

    Advanced Member

  • Site Supporter
  • 2,647 posts
  • Location:Birmingham UK

Posted 24 October 2006 - 11:15 PM

Not sure about the gearing but front forks are same type as 200 Fantic etc - 35mm Marzzochis, so any of the trials dealers should stock them. Or just match them up at your local bearing/seal company.

#3 honda pants

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 218 posts
  • Bike:Tiger Cub

Posted 25 October 2006 - 07:22 AM

View PostWoody, on Oct 25 2006, 12:15 AM, said:

Not sure about the gearing but front forks are same type as 200 Fantic etc - 35mm Marzzochis, so any of the trials dealers should stock them. Or just match them up at your local bearing/seal company.
Woody thanks for that do you know the cc's per leg when replacing oils ?
Also i have a spare set of Marzzochis from a Fantic or Swm i cant remember which one But the diameter of the sliders is 34mm but you are right about the seeley legs they are 35m thanks

#4 Woody

    Advanced Member

  • Site Supporter
  • 2,647 posts
  • Location:Birmingham UK

Posted 25 October 2006 - 07:54 AM

Recommended oil quantity is 220cc per leg so I'd use that as a starting point and fine tune to your liking. Same with the oil weight - personal choice really.

I've never heard of 34mm Marzzochis, if they're forks from a Fantic or SWM they should be 35mm. Some very early Fantics used 32mm. Later SWM used Betor

#5 zisko62

    New Member

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 23 posts
  • Bike:bultaco sherpa

Posted 25 October 2006 - 12:13 PM

Hi,
the first SWM (red and white) had a 34mm Marzocchi. There were also 34mm forks with special magnesium lower legs!!
cheers from Italy :chairfall:

#6 honda pants

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 218 posts
  • Bike:Tiger Cub

Posted 25 October 2006 - 09:55 PM

View Postzisko62, on Oct 25 2006, 01:13 PM, said:

Hi,
the first SWM (red and white) had a 34mm Marzocchi. There were also 34mm forks with special magnesium lower legs!!
cheers from Italy :blink:
Hi thanks for that i remember these were off a early SWM with Magnesiun lower legs.
Not much use to me so they can go on Ebay in the next week or so. :chairfall:

#7 tljm

    New Member

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 17 posts
  • Bike:Honda tl200r

Posted 27 October 2006 - 01:16 PM

Hi Honda pants,

In a TL 200,same RS engine than Seeley, original front sprocket 12T and rear 55T (pitch chain 428) this combination works really fine for trials.

#8 honda pants

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 218 posts
  • Bike:Tiger Cub

Posted 29 October 2006 - 09:04 PM

The sprockets on my Seeley are ;-front 10 rear 44 does anyone have the same on thiers any comments would be great :angry:

#9 pegasus

    New Member

  • Site Supporter
  • 5 posts

Posted 30 October 2006 - 09:01 PM

Hi, same with mine 10 and 44 th sprockets, workd fine did try a 9 on front and was very slow. Good luck with yours its all down to personal choice.

#10 dngrfld

    New Member

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 2 posts
  • Bike:Tiger Cub Trials

Posted 01 September 2010 - 11:27 AM

Mine came with 11 F 48 R (520). Not trialled it yet, just ridden it around a car park but felt at home doing figure 8's; 1st gear low enough not to push the front out and could stay off the clutch.

To confuse the issue Talon list 11 F 45 R as replacement sprockets, which looks a bit high geared to me?

To summarise the options here and above:

11-45 = 4.09:1
11-48 = 4.36:1
10-44 = 4.40:1
12-55 = 4.58:1 (TL200 with RS engine as mentioned in thread; and presumably same primary drive and gearbox ratios as Seeley Honda RS engine?)
9-44 = 4.89:1

Edited by dngrfld, 01 September 2010 - 07:40 PM.






1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users