06 Sherco Ignition Timing (again)
#1
Posted 16 April 2007 - 07:27 PM
#2
Posted 16 April 2007 - 08:42 PM
http://www.trialscentral.com/forums/index....amp;hl=ignition
can't comment about 3mm but 6 seems to work fine on my 2001, softer power and easier to start
Hope this helps .... Mike
#3
Posted 16 April 2007 - 09:40 PM
#4
Posted 16 April 2007 - 10:15 PM
ScottT, on Apr 17 2007, 07:40 AM, said:
Best of balance.
Neo
TRIALS....It's not life or death....It's much more serious than that!!
#6
Posted 16 April 2007 - 11:36 PM
ScottT, on Apr 17 2007, 09:12 AM, said:
Best of balance.
Neo
TRIALS....It's not life or death....It's much more serious than that!!
#7
Posted 16 April 2007 - 11:41 PM
If you slow the timing too much, there is also too much unburned HC in the exhaust which tends to overheat and lead to problems!
Edited by copemech, 17 April 2007 - 03:22 AM.
#8
Posted 17 April 2007 - 05:11 AM
copemech, on Apr 17 2007, 12:41 AM, said:
If you slow the timing too much, there is also too much unburned HC in the exhaust which tends to overheat and lead to problems!
#9
Posted 18 April 2007 - 05:35 PM
(i stamped a mark where the centre of the top bolt is as stock and moved the plate till the bolt was between the new stamped mark and the stock stamped mark which is approx 3mm counterclockwise so it is the correct way i think!)
Edited by stump magnet, 18 April 2007 - 05:56 PM.
#10
Posted 19 April 2007 - 02:31 AM
Seems all is well, I think mine did the same thing as I recall! May just go to show that the base timing is better that way in the lower revs. Possibly limiting the extreme upper end advance. The Leonelli will rev about 2000 revs higher than the old one! Not that you may need to go there!
As I recall, that note on the RYP site was written a while back, when the Ducati ignition was in use.
Can you not blip around in the driveway or street at home?
Running the mix screw in as much as possible has a smoothing effect as well, depending upon the day. What #pilot jet are you running? Sounds as though you are in the correct range.
#11
Posted 19 April 2007 - 03:00 AM
In an effort to keep things simple, that means that the initial 3mm of stator rotation has roughly twice the effect as an additional 3mm rotation, or in rough numbers 3mmBTC(standard), 2mmBTC, and 1.5mmBTC.
Below that, thing just do not seem to work well.
I have not degreed things out exactly of late, as I am really not concerned with the numbers as much as how it works, and 6-7 mm rotation on the plate seems to be about max allowable as far as retard goes.
Now as far as advancing for high altitude conditions goes? I really do not know. I am at about 500ft MSL(what is that, 150 meters?) above sea level here. So 0-1000ft variences apply, which are negligable. Trials bikes really are not GP racers, so they don't care!
#12
Posted 19 April 2007 - 05:06 AM
#13
Posted 20 April 2007 - 03:55 AM
I do not think you would have any problems running the Irridium plug at .023-.025, but is a RESISTOR plug!
On the very limited output ov the system, to me it sort of defeats the purpose.
I prefer the BP5EVX non resistor Platinum, and have run them at .027-.028 without problem.
As they are no longer available here, see if you can find some, as those places over there do not want to ship to here.
In sparkie tech, it means having minimal electrical resistance and maximum electrode exposure and flamefront propagation in a system that makes the minimum required output and give maximum resistance to fouling!
And yes, they run better off the bottom as compared to stock!
Hope that makes sense to you!
#15
Posted 21 April 2007 - 02:26 AM
Do you think you could send me a few so I can you send the Paypal?
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users















