Bsa Bantam Head And Barrel
#16
Posted 23 December 2010 - 12:12 PM
OK Just going to throw a spanner in the work,s
Isn't it about time we stopped using the term "PRE 65"? This was coined in the first place by Deryk Wylde. for the trials championship that he set up. And since then the term as been abused by everyone, that has laid a spanner on a period trials bike since.
To my mind, and others, any British Trials Bike should now be named,A British Twin-Shock.(BTS). And there should be different categories within the criteria, including as an end class the now famous "Special" class,and has everyone knows, this is the class, that most machines should fall into?
Regards Charlie.
#17
Posted 23 December 2010 - 12:15 PM
shedco, on 22 December 2010 - 09:50 PM, said:
I usually get beat on my Ty by a chap older than me on a.....
rigid bantam!
LOL we all get beatem by him
#18
Posted 23 December 2010 - 12:21 PM
charlie prescott, on 23 December 2010 - 12:12 PM, said:
OK Just going to throw a spanner in the work,s
Isn't it about time we stopped using the term "PRE 65"? This was coined in the first place by Deryk Wylde. for the trials championship that he set up. And since then the term as been abused by everyone, that has laid a spanner on a period trials bike since.
To my mind, and others, any British Trials Bike should now be named,A British Twin-Shock.(BTS). And there should be different categories within the criteria, including as an end class the now famous "Special" class,and has everyone knows, this is the class, that most machines should fall into?
Regards Charlie.
Hi Charlie
OK some more spanners coming into the ring. Accepting your arguement all non "special" class bike MUST conform then to a copy of the factory sales brouchure in every way. Just look at Ariels, was looking at Mick Grants on Sunday with it's factory fitted carbon fibre primary cover which i'm thinking of copying for the James, Cubs C15 and to get back on topic sort of Bantams.
That rules the lot out so we all ride in the "specials" class and we are back to square one.
Oh yes is a Majesty or a Cotswold now going to be classified a BTS British Twin Shock ?
Edited by Old trials fanatic, 23 December 2010 - 12:23 PM.
#19
Posted 23 December 2010 - 12:29 PM
Hi OTF.
Cotwold's Majesty's.?
Probably "BTS,FEI". (far eastern influence)?
Regards Charlie.
#20
Posted 23 December 2010 - 12:37 PM
charlie prescott, on 23 December 2010 - 12:29 PM, said:
Hi OTF.
Cotwold's Majesty's.?
Probably "BTS,FEI". (far eastern influence)?
Regards Charlie.
LOL LOL Merry Christmas Charlie
#21
Posted 23 December 2010 - 01:53 PM
I just picked this subject up, it happened to be in the pre 65 section ??
http://www.bmca.org.uk/classes.html
Edited by bo drinker, 23 December 2010 - 01:55 PM.
#22
Posted 23 December 2010 - 03:23 PM
#23
Posted 23 December 2010 - 07:26 PM
cheers the noo Brian
#24
Posted 23 December 2010 - 08:29 PM
broony, on 23 December 2010 - 07:26 PM, said:
cheers the noo Brian
#25
Posted 09 January 2011 - 09:47 PM
Old trials fanatic, on 22 December 2010 - 11:40 AM, said:
And people moan about the Scottish Pre65
Last time we rode a Yorks Classic Trial (no fork gaiters) we were followed round for almost all the trial by one club member who never stopped moaning at us for committing this heinous offence against yorkshire decency, needless to say we have not been back.
#26
Posted 10 January 2011 - 04:57 PM
TrialsRfun, on 09 January 2011 - 09:47 PM, said:
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users















