Ossa Renovation
#1
Posted 19 November 2009 - 06:17 PM
#2
Posted 19 November 2009 - 07:01 PM
Look here - http://www.ataq.qc.ca/galerie/index.php?fo...=/Mus%E9e/Ossa/
Yours would be the 1974 model as produced by the factory - for the UK the fibreglass tank was changed to an alloy one by the UK importers as fibreglass was outlawed by then. One of the nicest looking trials bikes ever made.
Lots of info on this site too http://hem.passagen.se/ossa/
#4
Posted 19 November 2009 - 09:39 PM
I think you may have misread the numbers as the engine numbers start with a M, also the stampings were not done very well on some bikes so could be possible to confuse a 1 with 4
Are you planning on a stock looking restoration or with a few mods for riding? pictures would be nice
I've got 7 of them to do when I've finished my yank car
Plenty of suppliers in UK, USA and spain, dont think there's any problem with building one to as it left the factory condition if thats what you want
AMO
#5
Posted 20 November 2009 - 07:04 AM
#6
Posted 20 November 2009 - 08:02 AM
With the dished sprocket, there was a long spacer between the sprocket and swingarm and as the spindles are only 12mm and a bit soft, the pull of the chain could bend the spindle slightly where it was unsupported. I don't know whether the flat sprocket conversion was to cure this or because it was cheaper to produce than a dished sprocket - or both, although pattern dished sprockets were produced as well by some companies.
Dished sprockets have been unavailable for years now, but finally they are being reproduced in Spain
#7
Posted 20 November 2009 - 08:47 AM
(.)(.) + £ = ( . )( . )
#8
Posted 20 November 2009 - 08:57 AM
B40RT, on Nov 20 2009, 08:47 AM, said:
#9
Posted 20 November 2009 - 10:05 AM
Woody, on Nov 20 2009, 08:02 AM, said:
With the dished sprocket, there was a long spacer between the sprocket and swingarm and as the spindles are only 12mm and a bit soft, the pull of the chain could bend the spindle slightly where it was unsupported. I don't know whether the flat sprocket conversion was to cure this or because it was cheaper to produce than a dished sprocket - or both, although pattern dished sprockets were produced as well by some companies.
Dished sprockets have been unavailable for years now, but finally they are being reproduced in Spain
Talon make a flat sprocket with spacer conversion , www.inmotiontrials.com have them.
#10
Posted 20 November 2009 - 10:32 AM
monoped, on Nov 20 2009, 08:57 AM, said:
Yes, whilst dished sprockets were still around Keith Horsman made a very neat bearing carrier that bolted onto the dished sprocket which gave support to the spindle. You ended up with 4 bearings on the sprocket side of the wheel.
The spacer used with the flat sprocket conversion also acts as a bearing carrier.
#11
Posted 20 November 2009 - 08:42 PM
#12
Posted 21 November 2009 - 04:25 PM
The one on the left is the flat sprocket spacer, the one on the right is the extra bearing carrier/spacer for dished sprockets

Also a few things I've noticed lately;
If you stand a bare frame on a surface plate (flat table) with both front down tubes and the bottom of the frame resting on the table (the side of the headstock tube is at 90* to the table) then measure from the table to the footrest brackets the left footrest is 6mm higher (or lower, cant remember which) than the right footrest
I have done this with 3 TR77 frames and 1 MAR, all the same
Whats that all about???
Also;
Tried using a set of TR77 yolks on a mk2 MAR for temporary use, it doesn't work the MAR yolks are 10mm wider on the centres of the stantions
Was scratching my head for a while wondering why the wheel would not fit again
You can tell the TR77 yolks from the MAR yolks as they are a lot flatter and deeper when looking at the front of them
Dont want anyone to lose sleep over these points just thought it may be of use to somebody
#13
Posted 22 November 2009 - 12:34 AM
AMO, on Nov 21 2009, 04:25 PM, said:
The one on the left is the flat sprocket spacer, the one on the right is the extra bearing carrier/spacer for dished sprockets

Whats that all about???
The original jig was out ?
(.)(.) + £ = ( . )( . )
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users














