Sprite Trials Bikes
#1
Posted 09 January 2011 - 09:43 PM
Ads By Google
#2
Posted 09 January 2011 - 10:57 PM
If a club is running a Pre65 class, a 2011 spec James/FB/Cub is ok, a genuine 1966 Sprite isn't. Oh the irony of Pre65 eh.....
#3
Posted 10 January 2011 - 12:37 AM
Edited by totalshell, 11 January 2011 - 02:12 AM.
#4
Posted 10 January 2011 - 10:40 AM
#5
Posted 10 January 2011 - 11:08 AM
Woody, on 09 January 2011 - 10:57 PM, said:
If a club is running a Pre65 class, a 2011 spec James/FB/Cub is ok, a genuine 1966 Sprite isn't. Oh the irony of Pre65 eh.....
Thats what i thought too Woody which is one of the reasons why we now run British Bike not Pre65 but i notice from the entry list for the Scottish Pre65 two day this year that they have allowed four Sprites to enter ??? now i am confused because that seems TOTALLY against the rules to let a bike manufactured after 31.12.1964 to enter a Pre65 event?
I also agree with TrialsRfun comments and feel more clubs should adopt as we have British Bike or British Twinshock and drop the ridiculous Pre65 tag as Sprites, Cheetah etc are surely within the spirit.
I've told the guy to come and ride at our events but am now wondering that my advice to him that his bike would NOT be eligable for the Scottish Pre65 is incorrect as they are letting them in. Better ring him up now and appologise.
Edited by Old trials fanatic, 10 January 2011 - 06:10 PM.
#6
Posted 10 January 2011 - 12:44 PM
How can the Scottish P65 organisers refuse an entry to someone with a Greeves Anglian which is only marginally different to the earlier Scottish models while accepting entries from people riding newly built stuff with few original parts. I am not against the modernised bikes but there must be room in all events for both types of machine and for this reason all of the sections in all classic trials should be laid out so as to allow genuine British machines to be ridden competitively.
Edited by TrialsRfun, 10 January 2011 - 12:44 PM.
#7
Posted 10 January 2011 - 01:25 PM
Dennis Jones (Jonna) was riding a Sprite in 1964. He was working in the BSA/Ariel development department, and was, if my memory serves me correctly
Frank Hipkins development rider.
#8
Posted 10 January 2011 - 04:45 PM
pat slinn, on 10 January 2011 - 01:25 PM, said:
Dennis Jones (Jonna) was riding a Sprite in 1964. He was working in the BSA/Ariel development department, and was, if my memory serves me correctly
Frank Hipkins development rider.
But Pat were they commercially available before 31/12/1964 ??? because if not they are surely NOT elegable. If an exception is made for a "development" bike not commercially available then lets all wheel out "development" Bultacos
I am sure you or Big John will know the answer to this. When was the first Sprite ridden in the Scottish 6 days trial and as a matter of interest when was the first Bultaco ridden in the Scottish also
#9
Posted 10 January 2011 - 08:27 PM
Old trials fanatic, on 10 January 2011 - 04:45 PM, said:
I am sure you or Big John will know the answer to this. When was the first Sprite ridden in the Scottish 6 days trial and as a matter of interest when was the first Bultaco ridden in the Scottish also
#10
Posted 10 January 2011 - 08:42 PM
swisha, on 10 January 2011 - 08:27 PM, said:
In which case i bow to your superior knowledge. The organisers of the Scottish knew their onions better then i and i will pass this on to the Sprite owner who contacted me
Ads By Google
#11
Posted 10 January 2011 - 10:06 PM
cheers the noo Brian
#12
Posted 10 January 2011 - 11:20 PM
swisha, on 10 January 2011 - 08:27 PM, said:
That seems fairly conclusive then, they were available before 1965, which contradicts everything I have been told about when they were manufactured.
#13
Posted 11 January 2011 - 09:29 AM
Isocrates
"Our past is the key to our future" L. Leakey
#14
Posted 11 January 2011 - 09:38 AM
Ariel had long since ceased production of their single cylinder four stroke likewise BSA with the Goldstar.
In 1965 Bultaco started to produce the Sherpa, all the early trials for classic machines were for four strokes only so P65 was deemed ok. All very well & good but what about the two strokes which were produced until around 1970 with the Villiers engines fitted.
To this day the P65 title has caused trouble when organising a classic trial so surely it is time to change the name of our classic events.
Edited by trialsrfun, 02 March 2013 - 05:44 PM.
#15
Posted 11 January 2011 - 10:07 AM
TrialsRfun, on 11 January 2011 - 09:38 AM, said:
Ariel had long since ceased production of their single cylinder four stroke likewise BSA with the Goldstar.
In 1965 Bultaco started to produce the Sherpa, all the early trials for classic machines were for four strokes only so P65 was deemed ok. All very well & good but what about the two strokes which were produced until around 1970 with the Villiers engines fitted.
To this day the P65 title has caused trouble when organising a classic trial so surely it is time to change the name of our classic events.
Yes indeed, the Pre65 title was purely to prevent the Bultaco and then the Ossa and Montesa that followed, from competing in classic events.
A far better definition is British Bikes Pre70 which has long been adopted by some clubs and national series.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users











