Edited by B40RT, 31 October 2011 - 07:27 PM.
Are Betors Better ?
#1
Posted 31 October 2011 - 07:26 PM
(.)(.) + £ = ( . )( . )
#2
Posted 31 October 2011 - 07:56 PM
Later SWM were fitted with Betors, maybe they were a better financial deal than the Marzocchis?
#3
Posted 31 October 2011 - 11:28 PM
#4
Posted 01 November 2011 - 02:23 AM
#5
Posted 01 November 2011 - 11:57 AM
Will stick with the Marzocchi's, only thought about changing as Betor is much easier to spell !
Ross
Edited by B40RT, 01 November 2011 - 11:59 AM.
(.)(.) + £ = ( . )( . )
#6
Posted 01 November 2011 - 04:04 PM
Since nearly 30 years, I've allways been told that the Betors was better than the Marzocchis.
Sorry for the bad english.
Nicolas
#7
Posted 01 November 2011 - 04:21 PM
NicolasVasic, on 01 November 2011 - 04:04 PM, said:
Since nearly 30 years, I've allways been told that the Betors was better than the Marzocchis.
Sorry for the bad english.
Nicolas
I went from a 350 Bultaco with Betor's to the SWM with Marzocchi's, thought at the time the SWM steered etc better, but to many other factors to really compare. It certainly was the fashion at the time to swap the forks for Betor's, does your friend have the Marzocchi yokes as MartinM suggested for the best set up ?
Ross
(.)(.) + £ = ( . )( . )
#8
Posted 01 November 2011 - 08:16 PM
Nicolas
#9
Posted 01 November 2011 - 08:29 PM
And see the results: The Belgian Cordonnier/Goset/Scheen all with Betor, two places before Burgat/Coutard/Schreiber, all with Betor too!
Goset drove one of the Michel Gossiaux'bike and Michel had made the set up of the Bernard Cordonnier's one, with the help of my clutch springs.
Nicolas
#10
Posted 01 November 2011 - 09:35 PM
NicolasVasic, on 01 November 2011 - 08:16 PM, said:
Nicolas
These are Bultaco "Yokes"
Edited by B40RT, 01 November 2011 - 09:36 PM.
(.)(.) + £ = ( . )( . )
#11
Posted 01 November 2011 - 10:20 PM
Yes these clamps can have a big effect to the steering as on trials bikes the distance between lower fork clamp (yoke) and upper fork clamp (yoke) are mostly differnt to the steering head axis. The upper clamp is a little bit further away to the center of the steering had then the lower one. This will result in a steeper fork angle and improve the understeer. This is a little bit visible in the parts book of the Montesa 200.

To the forks itself, I had two Italjet Piuma's back in the eighties, the first bike had Betor forks which worked very well, (coming from Bultaco). The second bike came with Marzocchi's mounted, there where no big differences as I remember only that it took much longer until they where breaked in, (The fork had a some stop - loss or breakaway torque when new).
#12
Posted 02 November 2011 - 01:32 PM
Nicolas
#13
Posted 05 November 2011 - 12:16 PM
Curiously when I swapped my springs from my second SWM these ones had spacers and were flush with the tops of the tubes. When fitted to the forks with the busted oops I mean super progressive multiple stage springs they were 20mm proud and dont seem to need the spacers. No colour dots on this pair.
Edited by Reginald, 05 November 2011 - 12:33 PM.
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users















