First mono shck trialsbike
#1
Posted 26 November 2011 - 10:29 PM
#2
Posted 27 November 2011 - 12:50 AM
#3
Posted 27 November 2011 - 03:04 AM
The first Yamaha linkage-type single shock trials bikes were in existance in the early 1980s as development bikes but the design was not "revealed" until 1983.
There were probably home-made single shock trials bikes before Yamaha started making them.
#5
Posted 27 November 2011 - 11:13 AM
Certainly the Cheney Ossa were around the same time and may be slightly earlier than the Yam cantilever.
I would be interested to know the exact date they were announced if anyone has some old MCN's.
#6
Posted 27 November 2011 - 05:01 PM
mattylad, on 27 November 2011 - 11:13 AM, said:
Certainly the Cheney Ossa were around the same time and may be slightly earlier than the Yam cantilever.
I would be interested to know the exact date they were announced if anyone has some old MCN's.
Think the Vincent was cantilever, but had 2 shocks side by side to save space.
(.)(.) + £ = ( . )( . )
#7
Posted 27 November 2011 - 08:00 PM
seth29, on 26 November 2011 - 10:29 PM, said:
Seth your confusing two or three different types of JCM.
The 323 was a Tau engine as riddden by Charles Coutard, Joel Descuns, Benard Cordonnier and John Reynolds. This bike was tested by Birks for TMX but he never rode one other than that as he was on the Yam at the time which was light years ahead. There was also a 250cc version of this bike. This is the original JCM factory, their last bike had the tank under the seat and its best result was 3rd in the 86 French WTC tround in the hands of Pascal Cotourier. As a mono it as first ridden by Coutard and Descuns in the world rounds in 83, Descuns rode the SSDT in 84 on one.
None of these models were imported prior to June / July 1984, your bike will have been made in 83 but at that point there was no importer so its either been brought into the country by an individual or its been old stock when supplied by JCM.
This JCM concern went bust late 86 / early 87 but a new JCM company was launched and Tony Scarlett signed for them and rode that bike, called a Viga for two years, this was similar to the last bike Cotourier had but with a Gas Gas air cooled engine which I think was based on Moto Villa MX bike.
The next JCM incarnation was the Striet JCM, this was the bike ridden by Birks and imported by Bob Gollner and I suspect was another different company from the one Scarlett rode for.
JCM had their bike out in public in the WTC in 83, Bikrs first rode the Yam competitively in Aug 83 I think at the Hillsborough as it was then. The Beta TR32 came out early in 84 but again wasnt as good as the Yam.
#8
Posted 27 November 2011 - 09:30 PM
I found a tmx on e bay some time ago with birk on a 323 but just presumed he was riding for them not that it was a test.
So back to the start, what was the first production bike that a man could buy was it the beta,yam or jcm. went over to see Joel Correy and he showed me a pic of a jcm in the ssdt in 1982 but this was a pre production bike so not counted.
seth..
#9
Posted 29 November 2011 - 12:52 AM
mattylad, on 27 November 2011 - 11:13 AM, said:
Thrasher Grunge?
lineaway, on 27 November 2011 - 04:03 AM, said:
I wonder if Mick got dizzy?
Edited by TooFastTim, 29 November 2011 - 12:54 AM.
#11
Posted 05 December 2011 - 06:31 PM
B40RT, on 27 November 2011 - 05:01 PM, said:
Indeed so but barred from Twinshock motocross apparently (they can't be scared they would thrash a CZ surely) despite pictorial evidence that they were raced in the day. There's a famous picture of Lindsay King doing a nose landing on a 1000, brave man, in, I think, a Vincent history.
#13
Posted 05 December 2011 - 07:32 PM
2/4, on 05 December 2011 - 06:31 PM, said:
#14
Posted 06 December 2011 - 07:14 PM
TRICKYMICKY, on 05 December 2011 - 07:32 PM, said:
True enough.
There is a body of opinion that considers shock absorber to be the correct term for the normal combined spring and damper unit, and I'm sure some Vincents have been modded to such a (non-standard)set up with two of these, usually Koni if I recall.
Personally I never use the term shock absorber (which was always more of a car term), suspension units being the motorcyle common usage for the damper and spring assembly back in my day. The American "Cycle" felt that the spring was actually what absorbed the shock (with some justification for, as they said, without a spring the hydraulic damper would absorb nothing) and the damper merely controlled the motion of the spring. This would appear to have some logic as, going further back, nobody ever referred to a friction damper as a shock absorber.
#15
Posted 07 December 2011 - 05:59 AM
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users















