July 18, 201412 yr Has anyone seen the email circulating dealers regarding the position of GGUK on the fork leg coating issue and wear? Read it and then read it again, what the fook, no responsibility, special deal, £400, my a***, if the bike wasn't such fun to ride, fook up all and buy a Beta!! What about fit for purpose, for £6000, I'd expect something half fooking decent. Rant over.
July 19, 201412 yr I love this! GGUK did not build them, what are they? Marzocci? That is an Italian word for FU! And yes, they are still perfectly fit for throwing at rocks!
July 19, 201412 yr I would have thought it was only an anodizing anyway so some wear has to be expected for the amount of sliding they do. I am sure the black ones on my ossa will be the same eventually Edited July 19, 201412 yr by canada280i
July 22, 201412 yr These are Tech forks copey as fitted to shercos. Std GG has Marzocchi which have always been fine in my experience
July 22, 201412 yr You have to read his original post. He let the front brake line rub on the fork leg.
July 23, 201412 yr Where does DJ say anything about the brake hose rubbing in his original post? I cannot find it.
July 23, 201412 yr Yeah, I didn't get that from the OP either. This is just wear and tear, if not what next? Are manufacturers going to be expected to warranty the frame where your boot rubs the paint off?.....
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.