August 27, 201411 yr Not being the greatest fan of the non stop ruling but getting on with it.... But watching old dvd's 2002-2003 era when they ran stop for one mark lost seems to work so much better. The riders giving their very best to keep moving for the clean ride but not all is lost if they come to a hault with only the one mark being lost. One mark lost for a stop seems to pretty fair rather then a soul destroying five! Would be good if Acu & F.I.M would look back for alternatives...
August 28, 201411 yr Trouble was, you stopped three times and got a three and never dabbed! Then the rider argued each one.
August 28, 201411 yr I agree, makes sense to me, but then that was the rules I learnt under. Sections still needed to 'flow' but you could put in some more technical aspescts without it being unrideable for anything less than a five!
August 29, 201411 yr Stop + balance = 0 pts Stop + foot down = 5 pts (you are now a kick stand) Seems like a good compromise to me between No-stop and stop allowed.
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.