shercofray Posted June 8, 2011 Report Share Posted June 8, 2011 more to the point if his entry was on a 250 why is this a 300? entry list least whoever buys it can say they personally sponsored jarvis's ride for the ssdt. It does say the engine and been stripped down and built again, so they'll have done it as a 300 basicallyit Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
johnnyboxer Posted June 8, 2011 Author Report Share Posted June 8, 2011 The exhaust is over Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scoobydo Posted June 8, 2011 Report Share Posted June 8, 2011 (edited) There is nothing wrong with Pidcocks wanting to sell the bike and make a living. For those of you who don't know. Thats how all business's work. If you don't like the 4RT don't buy it. For all the rest. Its not Pidcocks fault if you can't afford it! It's not a case of cant afford it - I dont want it at that exhorbitant price ! And frankly anyone ''queueing up'' to buy it simply has not done their homework, Yes business have to make money but they also have to deal in a way which they are seen to be fair. 9K is not fair, in fact i'd say it was a joke ! Edited June 8, 2011 by Scoobydo Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trickymicky Posted June 9, 2011 Report Share Posted June 9, 2011 It's not a case of cant afford it - I dont want it at that exhorbitant price ! And frankly anyone ''queueing up'' to buy it simply has not done their homework, Yes business have to make money but they also have to deal in a way which they are seen to be fair. 9K is not fair, in fact i'd say it was a joke ! Well,if you dont want to pay a premium for that one,i'm sure they will sell you a similar one without the provenance for the current market value. But i suspect you wont want that one either,will you? Just to amuse us further,what would you pay for the Jarvis bike? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
beatabeta Posted June 9, 2011 Report Share Posted June 9, 2011 From what I ca see it is NOT a Future bike it is a normal bike with some Future trick bits. I'm not a Montesa fan anyway and cannot be bothered to cross reference the standard Mont with a Future Mont and then re-cross reference with this bike. Anyway, who gives a rats @rse whose bike it was? It's not like a current WTC superstar rode it, won on it and had everything put back as brand new and it's still done the worlds longest and toughest trial. Based on the fact that a.the super-super Future Montesa price is around Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.