Looking at the specs, timing for 2000 & 2001 2.9s is 2.7 mm. For 2003 it is close at 3.0 but the 2002 spec is 3.8. Why the difference? (The 2.5 specs show a similar pattern.)
Why Is Timing For 2002 Different?
Started by mcman56, Dec 31 2007 07:15 PM
3 replies to this topic
#1
Posted 31 December 2007 - 07:15 PM
#2
Posted 31 December 2007 - 08:26 PM
Think they changed from ducati to leonelli ignition but was summat like that.
#3
Posted 01 January 2008 - 02:51 AM
They were just tuned more aggressivly from the factory.
The '06 and up bikes are much smoother and run well on 93 pump gas, although my '07 still has a sticker that promotes 98 octane, it is not neccessary.
The '06 and up bikes are much smoother and run well on 93 pump gas, although my '07 still has a sticker that promotes 98 octane, it is not neccessary.
Ride it Like it was one of your old Girlfriends, If you still remember how!
#4
Posted 03 January 2008 - 06:46 PM
copemech, on Dec 31 2007, 10:51 PM, said:
They were just tuned more aggressivly from the factory.
The '06 and up bikes are much smoother and run well on 93 pump gas, although my '07 still has a sticker that promotes 98 octane, it is not neccessary.
The '06 and up bikes are much smoother and run well on 93 pump gas, although my '07 still has a sticker that promotes 98 octane, it is not neccessary.
Not that I want to push the thread off-topic but regarding that little sticker asking you to fill the bike with “98” fuel…
It’s good to know that Europe uses RON (Research Octane Number), while USA & Canada, for example, use an average of the RON and MON (Motor Octane Number). So for the same fuel, the numbers appearing on the pump at the gas station will differ depending on where in the world you are…
Example: Regular fuel rated 87 in the USA would be the same as the 91-92 in Europe.
Premium 93 in US would be similar to the 98 in Europe.
Hugo
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users















