Jump to content

Non Stop - In Reality


kbtrials
 Share

Recommended Posts

 
  • 2 weeks later...

Well no, trials may not be quite tennis but it is insofar as an observer / line judge is at time required to make a difficult judgement that others sometime disagree with, occasionally very abusively. Have a look at the Penrith observers thread where an observer at this years event is vowing never to observe again.

i believe observing should be strict - if not riders scores are / look too low and the clerk of the course may make future events harder unreasonably putting off poorer riders. Perhaps if WT marking was stricter the top class would have more participants.

Where WTC riders get away with observer abuse to lower their scores this encourages some riders to employ the same tactics at lower level trials resulting in a loss of observers. Then trials are run on a "mark yourself basis" and some riders resort to cheating spoiling the event for all. Another consequence of loss of experienced observers is that the standard of observing drops. I have ridden in 2 trials where the use of very young inexperienced observers made the result a lottery.

Trials can be a sport where good natured sportsmanship is the norm, participants just have to accept that judgements do not always go their way but over time things tend to even up. The alternative is a

rather unpleasant win at all cost mentality.

Having said the above there does need to be a system where a rider can protest a genuine grievance but that should not mean tolerating observer abuse.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 
  • 2 weeks later...
 
 
 

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now
 Share

×
  • Create New...