Skip to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

Trials Central

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.

Considering switching from 2T to 4T

Featured Replies

I have been a trials rider since 1974. My 1st trials bike was a 1974 TL125. That was also my last 4T trials bike. Since then I have owned and ridden only 2 strokes and at least 10 were GG 300’s. My current bike is a 2023 GG 300 GP. I love it and at 68 years old, it is way more capable than me. I have considered the switch before, but always go with the 2T - lighter and probably more power. However, I am not nearly as concerned about a few extra bike pounds at this point, and the sections I ride are no longer filled with major obstacles.

I recently acquired a beautifully restored 74 TL125. I am thinking now might be the time to get the most state of the art, current example of a 4T trials bike. A 2027 301rr when they become available. A cool couple of bookends.

I would truly welcome the thoughts of anyone who may have made a similar switch before.

If the distribution and dealership representation was better here, I would be riding Montesa again. The Cota is far more settled in the suspension, not as lively as many 2T bikes and the 4RT thrive on revs with smooth throttle control and lots of clutch abuse, great bike for hill climbs and deep mud. They don't cold start in serious cold winter weather unless you have a heated garage or build a fire under it, small concern for most. After about 3 or 4 years you will need to learn how to adjust valve clearances very accurately.

Riding a 4T is totally different but great. We've had 4t's for probably 11/12 years... did recently by a TRS just to see if we could be tempted back from the dark side but although the TRS is light and nimble I think we'll stick with the 4T's. You could consider the beta 4t. less complicated. No F.I, ECU, Throttle body, no expensive pump in the tank. Slower idle speed (4RT idles at 1800rpm). I'm a rubbish rider, but had a 4rt which I nearly scrapped due to intermittent throttle body issues. Got it fixed then moved onto Beta 4t's... never regretted it, so much so my son bought one. Had them for probably 8 /9 years now..

4Rt's are lovely bikes but if they do go wrong (not often, granted) then its a pain to try and trouble shoot unless you have a spare bike to swap parts over on as I found.

omg Honda PGM-Fi is light years superior to the CV carb on any motorcycle, it has one screw to adjust, the idle and it never misses a beat.

Beta CV carb has what? 2 chokes, vacuum fuel tap, vacuum throttle lag and a vented float bowl just like a toilet tank works.

... was it water or condensation in the connector to the throttle body? is fixed easy, open it and blow the water out.

Edited by lemur

  • Author

Thank you for your thoughts. Not sure what I will do, but will continue to ponder.

20 hours ago, Kschwartz said:

Anybody….? Thoughts?

When initially changing from a 14 Beta 300 2t factory to a 16 Beta 300 4t, I struggled with full lock turns. The 4t felt a bit abrupt just when the throttle slide lifted so it tended to push the front wheel. It took a while to adapt. The 2t was fairly smooth up to mid range when it started to produce lots of power I did not need and it could get me in trouble. By comparison, the 4t felt fluffy on top.

I later moved on to an 18 300 4rt. I was told the Beta 4t and a 300 4rt were very similar but it was not my experience. (also rubbish rider) The Beta had a much softer throttle response in the lower rev ranges so required less precise throttle control. This could be good or bad depending on your taste. Probably because of the softer response, it hooked up quite a bit better in low traction situations. I can't quantify but the 4rt feels bigger which could be a plus or minus based on your size. I believe it is about 7 pounds heavier. The 4rt frame feels much more rigid and transfers more shock through the handlebars. At 70, I have had surgeries on both hands plus forearm problems so am very sensitive to the shock forces. It is not the fork tuning as the Tech fork is quite plush. I ended up making rubber handlebar mounts to compensate, like CRF250. I like low idle speeds so the higher idle of the 4rt is annoying. The quietness of the Beta is nice. Initially, the 4rt felt like a real handful and it took me about 10 hours to get comfortable on it .

Maintenance wise, the Beta 4t carb is much more difficult to get out compares to the Evo 2t carbs. Then, you almost have to drop the Beta engine to get to the valves. Valve adjustment access is infinitely easier on the 4rt. Oil changes are much more difficult on the 4rt. Oil filter access requires removing an engine side cover. It has separate engine and transmission oils. The recommended 4rt trans oil is $50 per liter. The 4rt rear brake is much better than the Evo rear brake.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

Account

Navigation

Search

Search

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.