Edited by totalshell, 07 March 2012 - 03:37 PM.
New Beta Works Bikes
Posted 07 March 2012 - 03:36 PM
let Richard III rest in York..
Ads By Google
Posted 07 March 2012 - 04:46 PM
Posted 07 March 2012 - 07:05 PM
but they are no substitute for brains!
Posted 07 March 2012 - 10:17 PM
There are two types of men in this world:-
1) Those who are Geordies and..
2) Those that want to be.
Posted 07 March 2012 - 10:54 PM
Posted 07 March 2012 - 11:20 PM
yes, last week, but they come with a "factory" drip tray
Beta magnesium crankcases..do they have a sell by date on them?
In the last few weeks I have welded the following Beta parts - front brake lever, rear brake lever, sump plate and crank case
Crikey, that sounds like a bad accident, skin a knee as well?
Edited by paul w, 07 March 2012 - 11:23 PM.
Posted 08 March 2012 - 01:07 AM
let Richard III rest in York..
Posted 12 March 2012 - 12:35 PM
Brake lever was off near new EVO - just dropped it on its side and the span adjusting screw dug in.
Rear brake was off about a 2 year old bike - just caught it on a rock going up a stream bed.
The sump guard on Rev 3 was removed to weld a small fatigue crack that was starting at the corner of one of the slots at the front. When guard was removed crank case damage became visible - the rubber cushion under the flywheel housing had been punched up through the right hand side crank case. Fortunately it could be welded by just taking engine out of bike and not having to strip it. Had the crank cases been magnesium I would think the bill would be about £600.
Posted 12 March 2012 - 01:50 PM
I hear what you say , but ive had magnesium engine cases and wheel hubs welded successfully by a number of welders at minimal cost.Each 3 foot 95% mag rod cost only a tenner , then some time . About 40-70 quid for a good amount of work and saved me hundreds . So the components dont have to be replaced , they can be repaired cheaply.
In the last few weeks I have welded the following Beta parts - front brake lever, rear brake lever, sump plate and crank case. Over the years I have welded crancases on Yams, Hondas and Gassers. Had these been Magnesium I would not have been able to. A quick look on Beta website shows crancases to be about £300 (Yams and gassers are a lot more) and I guess the new Beta magnesium case will be.a lot more than £300 also. Is this realy progress when you pay a lot more to shave off a few % of a Kg and render the part un repairable. I watched the WTC indoor trial from Spain on saturday night and more or less only the top 3 could make a decent attempt at the sections. What is the point of this expensive weight shedding excercise when only the top few in the world can make use of it and its just an added cost for the rest. The sooner the FIM bans magnesium and ups the minimum weight limit the better. Bou and Co would be just as spectacular with an extra 5 or 10 Kg and as a prevous poster says the rest of us should keep further from the table. Over the years I've seen quite a few riders spend a fortune to lighten their bike, and judging by their girth and riding ability they have spent even more at the pub!
I dont agree with that fact that only a few riders can make the most of the weight saving. Riding gets easier for everyone with a lighter bike. If this had been the view all along wed all be still on modified bultos from the 70's. We wouldnt be attempting half of the sections today at club rounds if we were all on Bultos . If we didnt want progress we wouldnt have Beta evos , Shercos ,new Ossa's or Gas Gas pros at all. The lighter the bike , the easier it is for clubmen to move it around, mid section, bounce, and pull over rocks.
The factories will never risk huge quality issues and getting huge recalls and warranty claims so they wont make anything to thin or to light.
My point is that the minimum weight rule should be reduced to 60KG and let progress continue.The quality wont be affected as factories cant risk it. The price cant rise as the consumers wont buy it. The consumer is safe.
Ads By Google
Posted 12 March 2012 - 11:38 PM
On the subject of welding magnesium I maybe chose my words badly. Instead of saying I can't weld it, I should have said I am reluctant to weld it for a number of reasons. The American Welding Society states "welding [of magnesium castings] that may contain oil in pores should not be welded" and "the welding of some alloys in the as cast conduition is not recommended because of the greater risk of cracking". Some cast magnesium requires several hundred degrees C preheat and up to several hours at 450 degrees C post weld heat treatment. Cast magnesioum alloys have very high shrinkage contraction on solidification, this leads to high stress levels in the welds which can cause sudden complete component failure at an unknown time in the future.
With an aluminium crancase you can get away without pre or post weld heating, usually avoiding the need for an engine strip. With magnesium alloys the need for pre and post weld heat means a full strip is probably essential, especially when the need to try to get oil out of pores is taken into accound as well. Some casting alloys also contain other alloying elements to increase fluidity during casting to enable them to flow into thin sections of the mould, these additions make them effectively unweldable.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users