Do you really believe if the factory made a prototype they would make it heavier than standard ?
No way - much more likely the extra lugs were added by a previous owner for sidecar use. The early frames are very heavy anyway owing to the quality of tubing used. I've heard this referred to as "gas pipe" and the like by knockers, but it was all that was available to the factory at the time.
What distinguishes this early crank from later ones ?
Would it be possible to use a later crank ?
Is your engine no. 21M.....followed by earlier/later than serial no. 1079 ? (I have an engine broken with that serial no. - this one had snapped its crankpin.......)
borderbul - Glad to read that you did the sensible thing and contacted DVLA - please keep us posted with how you get on !
gasserguy - The reason for my post and the "complex advice" is that I've fallen foul of DVLA rules in the past.
Example :- I had no V5 doc. for a bike which I had owned and been the "registered keeper" of for 10+ years and for which I had both old tax discs and an old style logbook IN MY NAME. I was informed by DVLA that the reg. mark was no longer valid as it had not been transferrred to the computerised register, and that the bike would have to be allocated a new age-related number. Some time later, and after selling the bike, I learned that a subsequent owner found himself in the same boat, and the bike ended up being allocated a THIRD registration mark ....!
Furthermore, I've read that DVLA has progressively tightened up its procedures regarding old vehicles and retention of reg. marks and in view of this, I've since made quite sure that any (registered) bike I own has a V5 or V5C in my name !!
twinnshock - Thanks for pointing out the importer position "pre-Comerford's" - I'd forgotten about that. As a VMCC member, I am also aware that the club has had a vacancy for a Bultaco marque expert for quite some time.
The registration no. is W?? 991F ? Have you done a DVLA vehicle enquiry to check if this number is on their computer system ?
If it is, you need simply to apply for a reg. document (V5C), stating that one was not handed to you at the time of purchase.
If it isn't on the system you will need a certificate verifying date of manufacture/make/model/capacity etc. I believe Inmotion/Bultaco UK are a DVLA-approved authority for this. The machine will then probably be given an age-related (non-transferable) reg. mark. (The fact that it has (or had) a reg. mark originally is no guarantee that you will be able to retain it, unless you can prove that the machine is of significant historical interest - I don't think that applies in this case) .....All as I understand it, but you could try ringing the DVLA, of course.
Of course, any carb. tuning (on this or any other bike) should be the last step in an overall tune-up - you must first ensure that everything else is OK..........
Mmmm.... that's interesting, and a timely subject for me, as I am currently trying to sort a piston/barrel for my mod. 85 Alpina.
11 hours ago, feetupfun said:
People do fiddle around with engines.
The liner of the original cylinder has effectively been ruined by some PO idiot with a grinder. The best cylinder I have (from a mod. 124) is on STD. bore and Mahle piston, but this has the shortest rear skirt of any 250 piston that I have ....
(I have a few new Sherpa pistons on the shelf (Mahle and Dinamin) and I've also kept some of the old pistons I've replaced in the past, for the purposes of reference and comparison etc. in the future.)
All the 350 (83.2mm. & oversizes) pistons have front and rear skirts of equal length.
All the 250 (72.0mm. & oversizes) pistons have a rear skirt shorter than the front ; this also applies to the later 240 (71.0mm. & oversizes) pistons.
I think this explains the reason for Saddleback's question raised in his o.p.
I know that mod. 212 is a 250, but unfortunately I do not know what piston would have been fitted originally, although it seems likely it would have had a shortened rear skirt.
As I understand it, if your hub is 2-piece with a removable spoke flange, as in the pics. from feetupfun , then it's the old style "heavyweight" item. This would have an iron brake drum which was actually cast-in as an integral part of the hub, and brake shoe linings 40mm. wide..
Hardchrome lining is a feature of the later one-piece "lightweight" hubs with brake linings 25mm. in width.
Remember, blueflag - a picture speaks a thousand words.........?
Sherpa250-.jpg.5f879395e31bc4bd5dc27f4d6c4338a5.jpg)
199A running refurb.
in Bultaco
Posted
To remove spoke cover disc, first remove sprocket. (Apologies if you've already done this).