Jump to content

nigel dabster

Members
  • Posts

    10,008
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by nigel dabster
 
 
  1. Perhaps you could have got round for 2 or 3 then? :rolleyes:

    I don't think Brown or Gubian found it that easy.

    My impression, mainly based on watching the indoor trials series is that Bou has raised his game a notch. He just seems to have that few % more confidence and ability compared to last year. Although anyone can slip as he did on the first day I would not be surprised if he goes on to dominate the season by a wide margin.

    think again.

  2. Oh for the good old days when forks came with gaiters, not stylish or cool but cheap and effective

    yes thin rubber is always the best defence against sharp rocks, and which bikes came with gaitors?

  3. Easter will always bring reduced entries as there are plenty of other events on and thats without family stuff/work etc.

    The organisers simply need to get on with it and not worry about numbers. They did so very well at Mow Cop there is no reason why if they keep up this standard of events that the series will succeed where the Sebac failed/got swamped by over 40 or 50's. Build it and they will come! My entries in!

  4. Didnt even know tarres bike failed and im not even sure it was a beta?

    Dont go with this cant fail at anything, greeves did well enough with a bag of Shiiite so why not?

    All new bikes have faults till they are proved by the ordinary riders anyway?

  5. Personally, (as I have said before) I think the market should decide. If somebody believes a modern mono trials bike with a air cooled head and barrel is the answer, then they should produce it and reap the rewards of an exploding market that has been waiting for such a bike. If they are successful, the others would surely follow.

    It seems to me that all the modern bike OEMs have followed a long history of technical innovation in developing the next best thing. Maybe this is the time for something different, but I seriously doubt anything the FIM mandates will be the answer. (at least from this shoot from the hip - no market data based group now in place) NONE of the modern OEMs are selling tons of there cheaper, heavier bikes as compared to the light weight and expensive versions. Forcing them to do so to grow the market is not a rational conclusion.

    NONE of the 2t OEMS have publicly supported any of the changes. In fact, all the new bikes seem to fly in the face of the new rules. Interestingly, The videos of all the WTC riders practicing seem to indicate they haven't given up on the stop and hop techniques either. To those folks who point out that the OEMS arent forced to change, only the WTC riders, then I would ask what good are the rules then. There supposed to help drive sales somehow.

    It seems backwards to me. In the past, weight limits were put in place to protect the small manufactures that didn't have the deep wallets of the big three who could outspend everyone else to gain insurmountable advantage. Now, its the small guys with the advantage and the big ones pulling for the changes for regulation to remove the competitive advantages.

    I say produce what you want and let the market decide. If your a big manufacturer, use your extensive engineering to win the market. Or Even maybe your extensive marketing group that can unveil the huge market for next big thing in trials - heck, maybe even a low cost, super reliable, air cooled mono.

    If all you (FIM) can come up with, is "well something had to be done", then sorry, I doubt many will rush to follow your lead. (I point to exhibit A - this long thread)

    Cheers.

    Excellent comments

    • Like 2
  6. I probably view it as one man's quest to build his perfect bike but entirely share the view held by Greeves regarding modifications to existing twinshock bikes.

    For a bike to be perfect it must have few if any faults, I think the x lite is in need of several modifications and a way off perfect.

 
×
  • Create New...