feetupfun

Sorry Brian I haven't got that far on the M198 yet. I might be able to try the Fantic type shoes more easily now though because my riding buddy Mark bought Steve Harvey's SWM which I think might have the same shoes as a Fantic.

Pommy says "don't you know the Queen's English?" Aussie says "yes I'm sure she is"

I think Brian is asking about the front brake

I suspect that having the offset pivot ends on the Bultaco is not helpful because it twists the shoe. They make it tricky to adjust the shoes outwards too! I moved the pivot holes inwards on my M49 to move the shoes out, by making bigger holes on a new centre and fitting bushes in those holes. Lots of work compared with the more common rocking pivot design. Also I think the material that the linings are made from is important. There is a big range of friction material in the market. One of the best I have found is whatever my local brake shop used to reline my KT250 shoes with. It works brilliantly. Another thing is that not all Hondas have brakes that work. I rode an otherwise beautifully set-up TL125 and it had a nice solid feel to the brake lever, but absolutely no retardation. We had swapped bikes and when the other rider came back with my bike he commented on the way my brakes had worked. I don't know how he even rode that Honda in sections. Just thought of another thing. My OSSA MAR now has great brakes after lots of attention, and there was one thing quite unusual I had to do to get them so good. The axle hole in the backing plate was not concentric with the shoe OD, and there was not enough clearance between the axle and the backing plate hole to get them concentric in service. A bit of filing to enlarge the axle hole in the backing plate was just what the Doctor ordered. Maybe some Bultaco backing plates are also not perfectly concentric? ps your Mother is looking very good tonight

TY175 frames distort and the footpegs bend down and the swingarm may crack too if an adult-sized person does repeated pancake or rear wheel landings from even only 3 feet high to flat ground. As for poor old Handel, he'll be Bach in a minuet Jumping up 3 foot ledges is a doddle but if you deliberately overjump the ledge and land on the rear wheel repeatedly, you will crack the swingarm

yes that is where they go, and they are to locate the crankshaft in the right place. You will need to understand shimming to put that motor together without damaging it

for what it is worth, the motor in the Majesty video is a 320

For second hand parts ebay is good New parts: In Motion Trials in the UK and South West Montesa in the US For more detail you might have to say what parts are you needing and where are you located

Another thing to consider is the (lack of) corrosion protection provided by running weak premix ratios and synthetic premix oil. Semi synthetic premix oil is better for protection from corrosion.

and all I can tell from that photo is that it is probably a post-1972 model 247. The tank/seat is pre-76 but that really doesn't say much because it is common for 247s to have the wrong year seat tank fitted. A photo showing the clutch cover and knowing the engine and frame numbers would help with the dating process What is the silvery looking lump on the front downtube?

Those rims are for tubed tyres The second plug hole can be used for a decompressor. Some people used them back in the day It is also possible to use the second hole for a sparkplug suitable for riding on the road. Quick change over of the cap when you go to ride trials again without any tools needed.

yes swapping yokes is probably easier than making changes to the frame, but it can't achieve the desired result. Apart from the theoretical reasons I have already posted, evidence for this is that if it worked, fitting different yokes to twinshocks would be a popular modification. What is popular, is fitting the forks and yokes from a later model bike, which improves the action of the front suspension. Making the steering more like a modern bike requires a steeper steering head angle.

All you do by altering the yoke offset is to change the trail and the wheelbase, does nothing to the steering rake angle. Steering rake is the angle of the steering head, not the angle of the fork tubes. If you increase the trail by using different yokes, you will need to move the axle forwards (ie use leading axle forks) to regain a decent trail dimension. Eccentric sleeves in the steering head or on the steering stem are used on other bikes to adjust the steering rake, but I suspect the Ty175 steering head is too small a diameter to fit eccentric sleeves. Another issue to consider is that if you just make the rake angle steeper without also moving the steering axis forwards, there will be clearance issues with the front mudguard on the frame and exhaust. Another issue with just steepening the rake angle is that you will shorten the already-short wheelbase

ACM has been going for two years now in Australia and the experience has been very much as old trials fanatic has already described, including the lack of Fantics. We run them on the same line as the Twinshocks. I would like to add that I would not count on too many new people coming to ride "old-bike" trials because of ACM class, rather it is riders who previously would have ridden Twinshock or Pre 65 who are riding the Air Cooled monos. I suggest you have a later cut-off than 1990 so that Yamaha Pinkys can ride.

does it really lock up the gearbox, or is it just dropping into gear?

I stopped watching FIM trials many years ago because for me, stationary trials bikes are boring to watch. I am very glad that there is going to be no-stop riding in the FIM events and will probably now start watching them again.

I haven't needed to do it because I prefer IRCs, but a friend has done it to the rear rim of his MAR and it worked for him with a X11 tubeless. I have also seen a posting that says you can grind away the inner edge of a tubeless tyre to get the same effect. I think I would prefer to grind the rim because you then only have to do it once

or use the same angle grinder to reshape the bead seats of the rim so the Michelin stays put

The postage is also pretty amazing (expensive)

The fluid only dissipates a miniscule amount of heat compared to the discs and calipers. There may be higher boiling point fluids available, but even if you raise the boiling point, the discs will just get hotter and melt the pad surface (losing their frictional properties) and maybe also catch fire. Bigger disc brakes as fitted to enduro bikes would work well for the sort of riding you do.

or fit a tubeless rim

I bought a TY175 that had DT front forks (in-line axle model) on it and they had used a brake plate which fitted both the DT fork leg and the front wheel, which is from an IT125, but has the same drum and axle dimensions as a TY175/250 front hub. If yours are in-line axle DT forks, you should be able to use the brake plate from an IT125 (or possibly DT125 E) for your DT forks and TY wheel. I fitted TY forks and TY brake plate to that bike so I'm happy to sell the brake plate that the bike came with.

oversize pistons usually have numbers stamped on the crown indicating the size that piston is bigger than standard size. The numbers could be imperial or metric values. If it says 010 it would usually mean 0.010 inches over standard size. If it says 25 that would probably be 0.25mm over standard size Pistons made for Yamahas would usually have the piston oversize in mm units Standard size pistons do not usually have size numbers stamped on them Sure-fire way to work out if it has been rebored is by measuring the bore diameter No idea what the > might mean

Welcome to the forums Steve. Please post photos of your Montesa when you get it. If it is from 1970 it will be a 247. If it is a 242 it will be 1984-86.

possibility 1 - when you put the carby back on you might have aligned it slightly differently with respect to vertical compared to before you took it off possibility 2 - maybe there was something holding the float valve open and you cleaned it out when you took the carby off