feetupfun

you can change the RPM that the clutch drives at by either doing what paul250 said, or by changing the clutch bobweight spring settings. Our 2010 model GG50 clutch engaged at too high RPM when new and I got it to engage at much lower RPM by removing two of the four bobweight springs. You could also change it by reducing the bobweight spring preload. I suspect that the same motor might also be used in a kids MX bike and all the motors are set up for that application. It only takes a few minutes to make changes to the clutch settings.

a friend of mine has one of those bikes and it also behaves strangely. In his case, the idle speed when warm varies with the angle that the bike is leaned over. He has taken it to the local Honda shop and the mechanic could not find anything wrong with the way the carby was set up. I have ridden it in competition sections and did not notice anything happening with idle speed. The only time I noticed it was with the bike stopped and leaning it over from side to side.

Yes John my memory is definitely going somewhere. Of course you're right, my photo shows my old M99. I just edited the posting

Yes lots of parts are interchangeable but some are not. You just need to tell the people you want to buy parts from which model Bultaco the part is for. If you take decent photos of the bits you are worried about, there are many people on these forums that will be able to identify which model Bultaco it comes from. From what we have seen in your photos it looks like the bike is mostly model 85, but has a later model front wheel and motor. Haven't seen the exhaust yet

That number tells us that the frame is a Model 85 Alpina which was the first 250 Alpina. Here is a photo I took in 1976 of my 1973 model 99 Alpina, which was similar to the M85, but was 325cc

When it was "pushing oil out the clutch side", where was it coming out? If the clutch oil is getting burned, oil will disappear, so you can check for that It's possible to have an air leak via the gasket joint between the crankcase halves, either via the gearbox or direct from the atmosphere. Again you can check for oil loss from the gearbox. If you have a spigot mount carby, the hose between the carby and cylinder may be cracked

that engine number is for a 1976/77 350 Alpina The frame, forks and triple clamps are earlier Sherpa T or Alpina (1972/73?). Front wheel is post 73 Alpina. Tank and seat is 72/73 Alpina. The frame ID number is stamped on the steering head There is some sort of tubular frame in front of the rear wheel that doesn't belong there

I'm sure it is possible. I tried it on a Bultaco M49 engine which is similar in the design of the main bearing fits to the 247. I was pulling the motor apart anyway, so it was just an experiment I did because people said they had done it. I found it was difficult to get enough strength in the weld. I welded a steel tube to the bearing inner and pulled on that. If your 247 has the original conrod/big end bearing, and it has been parked up for a while, I would say it is false economy just changing the main bearings at this point, because even if it currently has no measurable play in the big end, it is likely to fail unexpectedly which may wreck your cylinder bore, piston and rings Also consider that many motors with main bearing setups like the 247 develop a problem where a main bearing outer turns within the casing, or the inner turns on the crankshaft. It's common to require the casings to be sleeved and/or for the crank to be built up.

The primary drive cover does not look like 247. Cylinder looks like 247. From what I can see of the frame it looks like the seat/tank is a tilt-up like a 248. More photos would be helpful

Looks like it is a second hand import from Japan http://www.yamahaty.com/english/arbreen.html

The TY125 was not sold new in Australia so you may need to look up a French or German listing of Yamaha models to prove to yourself about the model prefix 539 meaning TY125

the lack of any numbers after the 539 probably means that the casing has been replaced with a new spare part. It is pretty common for people to fit 66mm barrels on TY125s

The fuel pressure does not need to bend anything to cause the float valve to pass, it just needs to defeat the floatation force applied by the float, which is probably what is happening. A restrictor will not help because it will not reduce the fuel pressure seen by the float valve at times when the fuel flow rate is low (just about the whole time on a trials bike) You could solve your problem by either fitting a fuel pressure regulator, or going back to using gravity to manage the fuel pressure. Bikes only need a fuel pump if the fuel level can go lower than the carby, or for fuel injection. To answer your question, no the float arm tabs won't bend due to fuel pressure, because the float will be pushed down into the fuel before they bend, and as the float is pushed down, the fuel pressure on the float needle will be relieved, and will overfill the float bowl

very nice, wobbler

here is a catalogue listing https://www.blackwoods.com.au/search/flexible-bearings-silentbloc/302024107?c=Product

common problem and is usually caused by the rear pads being worn at an angle, or worn too far down causing slave piston/s to stick in the "on" position, which causes the fluid to boil, which jams the brake on

The rubber torsion bush method is quite common on motorbike swingarms and it works fine. It can be tricky to remove them if you ever need to. They do last a long time and require zero maintenance. The original bushes in my 1975 KT250 are still working perfectly. The bushes are also called Silentbloc bushes in industrial catalogues. I recently replaced that sort of bush in my Whitehawk Yamaha swingarm and the replacement bushes were available from a local engineering supplies

Maybe it is because we both live so far from the UK, but this is my take on the problem too. I find that there are lots of times that aftermarket parts I buy need a few tweaks to fit properly, not just ignitions

To answer another one of your questions, lowering the front of the bike by sliding the fork tubes upwards improves the steering geometry for trials, but does nothing to the fore-aft mass distribution of the bike and rider, so it will not make the front heavier. It will lower the handlebar grips If you want to lighten the front, move the footpegs rearwards relative the rear axle. This can be done by moving the peg mounts rearwards, or moving the rear axle forwards. On your bike the wheelbase would not benefit from being shorter, so don't move the axle forwards By the way I'm not suggesting you need to lighten the front, that was your suggestion. If it was my bike, I would fit aluminium rims (to reduce steering inertia), aluminium trials handlebars (to reduce steering inertia) and slide the fork tubes up about 20mm

You can reduce the trail and make the steering rake steeper by sliding the fork tubes upwards in the clamps, yes, as shown in your photo. The fork caps currently on the forks will limit how far you can slide the tubes upwards. Options are to get fork caps that don't have the air valve cap sticking up so far, and fitting handlebar risers If you do slide the tubes up, test for mudguard clearance against the frame and exhaust with the forks fully compressed before you ride it

that photo does not illustrate the trail. If it was to show the trail, the tilted line should be drawn through the steering axis. That photo has the tilted line on the centre line of the fork tubes.

I helped fit an Electrex ignition to a friend's Ty175 about 3 years ago and did not come across that problem you are illustrating. Maybe the kit you were sent is for a different bike. I know that the Ty175 and Ty250 backing plates are similar but different so it could be that

the google translation of the text from the Tarticle is: The Montesa-Honda announced through a press of Honda Motor Europe, which in 2015 will continue the production of the Cota 260 4rt. We still know little or nothing about how will be the new montesa, what is certain is that it will continue to be available, the two versions that will be marketed from the beginning of September. Honda has announced changes at both the chassis section that bike but still has not leaked any more precise information about it. As far as the engine will continue on the road to 4 times PMG-FI electronic fuel injection, already tested last year by the two riders HRC Fujinamy and Bou. Since last April, the Montesa's racing department was taken over directly by the HRC under the name of the Repsol Honda Team, it will not be moved by the establishments Montesa-Honda neither the staff nor even the headquarters of the company. The Honda is at pains to specify that these changes have no consequence in the commercial sector and that the model will continue to be marketed under the brand Montesa. Good news for fans of Cota 4rt but a big disappointment for those who believed that the Montesa could finally go back to maybe 2 times with an innovative system with electronic fuel injection.

gearbox 300 ml primary drive 200 ml

the pattern of the holes in this IT250/YZ250 crankshaft advertised on eBay UK looks a lot like the pattern of holes in the works crankshaft shown above