steve fracy Posted November 9, 2007 Report Share Posted November 9, 2007 It is claimed to rev to 10,500 rpm so I dont think that is an issue now. Does anyone know if they have stuck with the 6speed transmission. I beleive if they have, this will also be a leg up on the competition as I personally love a 6speed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spud Posted November 11, 2007 Report Share Posted November 11, 2007 (edited) It is claimed to rev to 10,500 rpm so I dont think that is an issue now. Does anyone know if they have stuck with the 6speed transmission. I beleive if they have, this will also be a leg up on the competition as I personally love a 6speed. 10,500 is very high reving coupled with 71kg and fuel injection its looking good, very good. Sorry Steve i can't find any info on the gear box. Gas Gas Pro's have always been good in the mud,there is no reason why this shouldn't. As for the side valve engine i'm of zero knowledge on how good or bad this design is and reading the other comments and looking at the cyclinder head in the photos shown i'm going to guess its 300cc+..... a dyno chart would be nice to end any speculation. Some questions anyone else might want to answer along with me 1) Componants quality, are they any better than there 2t range? My thoughts are yes because they don't want anotehr Sherco 4t. Would i buy the Gasser? yes but only if they ask me to pay no more than Edited November 11, 2007 by spud Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hrc1 Posted November 11, 2007 Report Share Posted November 11, 2007 http://www.phototrial.it/2007/gasgas4t.html 6 speed, 24 bhp! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lastplacebrad Posted November 12, 2007 Report Share Posted November 12, 2007 (edited) http://www.phototrial.it/2007/gasgas4t.html6 speed, 24 bhp! All that new stuff to look at on a GG, f.i , 4t etc etc and in the third photo down the most interesting thing to look at for "beardy" is the 09 mudguard fixings!!! Edited November 12, 2007 by lastplacebrad Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ham2 Posted November 12, 2007 Report Share Posted November 12, 2007 Anyone know what those fins are just below the radiator,between the front downtubes? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gasgasthermo Posted November 12, 2007 Report Share Posted November 12, 2007 (edited) Anyone know what those fins are just below the radiator,between the front downtubes? i dont think so as it looks as if it below the rad and i am guessing that 10500 rpm on the info board is the max revs which is impressive! Edited November 12, 2007 by gasgasthermo Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hrc1 Posted November 12, 2007 Report Share Posted November 12, 2007 The fins........prob electrical gizmo. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
toofasttim Posted November 12, 2007 Report Share Posted November 12, 2007 Anyone know what those fins are just below the radiator,between the front downtubes? CDI unit? 24 HP bloody hell. I have enough problems hanging on to 18. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
atomant Posted November 12, 2007 Report Share Posted November 12, 2007 CDI unit?24 HP bloody hell. I have enough problems hanging on to 18. What would you say if I told you I was building a bike engine that develops 38hp @ 7,600rpm and which is lighter than the 4T engine! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ham2 Posted November 12, 2007 Report Share Posted November 12, 2007 CDI unit? A heat sink?? for a CDI unit ?? above a 4strokers exhaust manifold?? I hereby claim to have spotted the first design fault,what do I win? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spud Posted November 12, 2007 Report Share Posted November 12, 2007 What would you say if I told you I was building a bike engine that develops 38hp @ 7,600rpm and which is lighter than the 4T engine! I'd best not say a stupid smart-alec-comment because i think your capable of doing what your saying, so impress mate? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
atomant Posted November 12, 2007 Report Share Posted November 12, 2007 I'd best not say a stupid smart-alec-comment because i think your capable of doing what your saying, so impress mate? I will tell you about it on msn if you go online - Not ready to go too public with it yet Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
toofasttim Posted November 12, 2007 Report Share Posted November 12, 2007 No MSM, PM me Ian. Please.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fetona Posted November 13, 2007 Report Share Posted November 13, 2007 http://www.phototrial.it/2007/gasgas4t.html6 speed, 24 bhp! It looks BITCHEN to me! I hope it does well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
biffsgasgas Posted November 13, 2007 Report Share Posted November 13, 2007 YEAAAAAaaaaaa no more middle muffler to explode! Looks like cdi up front under the rad. Thats a lot lower than the present ignition box. If the air box is the same then the air filter should be a carry over. My only wonder is if this thing uses mass air flow or speed density type of air flow management? hmmm time will tell. I want i want i want! Ohv versus a flat head does not bother me one iota. Flat heads have great torque and so what if they run out of breath. Who needs rpms in trials. Atom dont count your chickens before the eggs have hatched. In detroit every body is building a 700 hp 10 second car but when it comes time to run they end up having a 200 hp noise maker infront of a used truck transmission that leaks like a siv. --Biff Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now