I couldn't make my mind up initially which thread to reply to as this one and the ACU Classic Championship thread are on similar lines in respect of Majestyman340's views on the events and the bikes that are being ridden.
At the risk of offending a large and loyal band of Majesty Yam fans:
Majestyman340's view of Pre65 machines would be that they are modified beyond what he considers to be sporting, relevant to their original design, to a point where he now referred to them as "Brit Specials" much to the disgust of many.
He has also stated that rules should be put in place to stop the same thing happening to the Twinshock class.
This is surely a bit hypocritical as he owns (so he says) on of the first "SPECIALS" that took a mediocre bike (getting a bit long in the tooth) and modified it to the point where became a World round winner in the hands of Mick Andrews and a bike that is so popular and sort after today that they are fetching very good money for machines that are far from pristine. (One just sold on Ebay for well over two grand).
After all Majestyman340, we are talking about a bike that no longer has the same frame or suspension geometry, engine position or in some cases (such as yours) the standard engine capacity.
Majesty's have been around so long now that they are a respected part of "Trials Folklore" and worthy of a second glance wherever you ride in most instances, (as I am a committed Yamaha Twinshock fan) but they were a "SPECIAL" in their day and by your thinking they still should be classed as SPECIAL in their own category". (Even a "BRIT SPECIAL", as it was the Brits who did the modifying).
I ride a "standard TY250" but it ain't standard by any means with the modifications that I have done to it to make it better (in my mind anyway) but it isn't very special either.
If I have offended any Majesty owners out there, then that was not my intention and for that I apologize, but Majestyman340 needs to understand that "SPECIAL" can mean anything that is modified from it's original design.