feetupfun

Further to the posting by MichaelMoore regarding the use of Reynolds 531 to make replica frames, I seem to remember reading that the standard OSSA MAR frame is made of chrome moly tubing. Whatever it is, it seems to work just fine to me.

Maybe the 600 UK pound Majesty frames are someone modifying TY250 frames to be replicas of the first model Majesty? I have wondered for a while why no-one is doing this as a business as there are so many TY250 frames around. If someone was making new Majesty replica frames and selling them for 600 UK pounds, they would be losing money on each one.

Here are the photos of how I did it for future reference

Its possible that the standpipe for the fuel tap has fallen off or split. You would need to take the tap out and have a look at it to know for sure.

I think you need to be a Site Supporter to post photos in a forum

They are quiet and well tucked in but if you want performance get the two piece WES.

Dan Yes the lower co-efficient of friction of the steel inserts is one reason for the special treatment for the basket finger/fibre plate interface, but it also greatly reduces the rate of formation of grooves in the basket finger slots ie because steel is more wear resistant than aluminium. David

Why not use a smaller bore master cylinder or a larger bore slave cylinder?

How could making a fibreglass tank be as easy as welding up a steel tank?? Welding will take an hour at the most while making a fibreglass tank would probably take 10 to 20 hours. Yes you need to purge the tank of air before welding it. Nitrogen, Argon or Carbon Dioxide will all work. I've even seen a tank purged with exhaust gas from a car prior to welding (but I don't rcommend it) Washing out with detergent and then drying before the inert gas purge prevents fuel residue causing problems with the heat.

CaptainFur The TR77 is a very nice twinshock bike, but not many were sold in Australia. That one on eBay at present is the only one I have seen in Australia for many years. At the time they were available new, the popular bikes for trials were the Montesa 348, Yamaha TY250 and Bultaco Sherpa T. Parts for all OSSA dirt bikes are readily available but the main suppliers are in the US, UK and Spain. Many of the TR77 parts (wheels, forks, engine parts) are interchangable with other popular (in Australia) OSSA models like the Explorer and MAR but parts specific to that model (ie the exhaust) would not be easy to source second hand locally. It would be fine to use for trials and mountainous trail riding. David Lahey

Welding the existing tank would be much easier or find a second hand tank from something else that will fit. Making a tank that looks any good from fibreglass will take lots of labour and they are easily damaged. I would love to have a steel or aluminium tank for each of my bikes that have fibreglass tanks.

I don't have a Cota 200 but here is somewhere you can get a manual from: http://www.southwestmontesa.com/montesa/manual.html You may get a better response if you post in the Twinshock forum next time

Thanks guys. Yes I see that will work well - thanks Woody. I'll post some photos for future reference.

I'm doing some renovations to my MAR and want to run the ignition wiring differently to where I found it (getting squashed between the bashplate and the engine cases) It seems obvious to run the wiring forwards and up the RH front downtube as I see was done to the MARs I see in photos with Mick Andrews riding. My query is how to route the wiring to the downtube. If I use the exsiting grommet slot directly underneath the flywheel but run the wiring forwards rather than backwards, I suspect it will get just as squashed as it did going backwards from that hole. If I make a new slot for the slide-in grommet at the 4 o'clock position, I fear that I will be weakening the crankcases in a critical spot (under the RH front engine mount lug). Another option is to cut a grommet slot in the magneto cover, but I think this might look a bit strange. Ideas, suggestions, comments please

More info needed for diagnosis over the internet

Yes I admit I do spend many hours getting my Twinshock bikes to work well. That is what I like to do. Some bikes take years to get just right. Here is an example of a recent little project. I just did a front wheel up for my Majesty 250. The wheel on it was OK but the brakes were not as good as some of my other TY twinshocks mainly because of drum scoring. Labour involved despoking the wheel, machining the drum, changing the bearings, polishing the rim, painting the hub and backing plate and respoking the wheel. Probably about 10 hours labour in total. Purchases were new spokes ($80), bearings ($15) and the oversize brake linings ($50). Total cost for amazing front brakes $AU145 or 60 UK pounds. I reckon that is a fantastic bang/buck ratio.

CaptainFur your question sounds very much like one that shaunb asked on the trials.com.au web forum a few days ago. If you are not shaunb, have a look at http://www.trials.com.au/phpBB3/viewtopic....f=16&t=3453

Does the frequency of the buzzing follow motor RPM?

Not only do the new shoes have to be bedded into the grooves, but also to be the same radius of curvature as the drum. New shoes in a drum that is even slightly oversize will only touch at one point on each lining until they bed in. To work properly, the whole surface of both linings has to touch the drum. By the sound of yours, it will probably take a long time to get to that point by just riding the bike and you will have the cam angle working against you by then. If you want reasonable brakes, get some oversize linings fitted to your old shoes and machine them to the size of your drum. If you want great brakes, machine the grooves out of the drum before you machine the linings. Yes it may seem like a big deal to you now, but you will have killer brakes if you do it properly. If you don't have much time and are made of money, the quickest might be to just buy a new hub and get the wheel respoked or get a SH wheel with a good drum. And yes, if you want a bike to be good to ride, you have to get it into good condition whether it is 5 or 35 years old. I've seen under-maintained 5 year old bikes with brakes probably as bad as yours.

Kimpybugalugs I just remembered something else about 2 stroke oils that might influence what you use. While full synthetic premix oil generally provides the lowest smoke and engine deposits formation rate, it does not protect the rolling element bearings from corrosion during non-use periods as well as semi-synthetic and straight mineral two stroke oils do. So if you only ride your bike once in a while and store it exposed to high humidity, or if you are not able to run the motor after washing your bike, you may want to consider using semi-synthetic oil. If you ride at least every week and keep your bike in a low-humidity environment, it probably doesn't make any difference in this regard which oil you use. David

Don't forget the effect on the brakes If your little blasts include much sustained downhill riding under brakes, you will certainly be overheating the brakes. I've seen them overheat after only about a minute of serious downhill high speed riding. Blue discs, boiling fluid etc. Braking into turns on the flat or only short downhills the brakes will be fine.

If your jetting is good, you can run as much oil as 20:1 and still not have oiling up problems. If your jetting is too rich, you can have oiling up problems with much less oil in the fuel. Where I live, Castrol TT is not a synthetic oil. Maybe you mean Castrol TTS? I have been using mineral based, full synthetic and semi-synthetic two stroke oils in the premix for my TY175 since 1976 and all my other twinshock trials bikes since I got them (ranging from 4 to 13 years ago). I have consistently run 33:1 fuel:oil with all three types of oil and have never had oiling issues. My sparkplugs last many seasons and never foul. I eventually replace them because of electrode wear. I have noticed that modern synthetic oils produce an almost invisible exhaust plume while the mineral based oils from the 1970s produced a more visible plume at the same ratio. I'm sure people have run their bikes on less oil and also not had problems but I'm just telling my story. David

Matthew Yes it sounds like unwanted air is entering your 247 motor. Don't assume it has to be the fault of the AMAL (but it may be). Because you have been diligent with your meintenance of the carby and have taken the trouble to avoid the usual pitfalls relating to air leakage and flange mounted carburettors, and that you know the history of the bike, you would know if the crankshaft seals have been replaced recently. If your bike has the original seals, they would be quite hard by now and susceptible to leakage when combined with any wear in the crank bearings (main bearings). Because you didn't mention heavy smoking as the performance deteriorated, it may only be the magneto side crank seal leaking at this stage. If on the other hand, you have replaced these seals in the past few years, the leakage may be the result of another issue. Here are some other possibilities: Cylinder base gasket leaking - would be visible as an oily deposit somewhere on the gasket joint. Body wear of the AMAL. You mentioned rebuilding the carby but didn't say if it had been resleeved. The slides wear very fast and you may have replaced the slide many times. The slide contact surface in the body also wears but at a lower rate and can cause leakage. Yes it is fine to fit a Mikuni carby. Mounting flange adaptors are available from Mikuni suppliers so you can fit a spigot mount carby to your 247 barrel. Suggest Hugh's Bultaco, Craryville, New York state as your Mikuni supplier. If you want your 247 to continue to look original, you can still buy new standard AMAL carbies. David

I just had to add my two cents worth. The forks and front wheel on the bike in the photo were used on all 348s and the first two models of the 349; the 1980/81 red tanked model 349 with the sight guage tube in the side of the petrol tank and longer swingarm, and the 1981/82 white tanked model). During the white tanked model run, 349s started to come out with the horrible (prone to failure of the spoke flanges) conical Honda design hub. The fork tube spacing was narrower on the white tanked model 349 compared with the 348s. This doesn't really matter but may help with identifying which model triple clamps you have. Not sure about the first red tank 349 fork spacing. If you intend riding the bike in competition, compare the swingarm length of your Monties. You may have the swingarm from the first model 349 which had a longer swingarm than the 348 and the later 349s. The long swingarm is great for hillclimbing and the shorter one is great for tight stuff.

Yes it is important for older style riders. I don't hop the front or back so the tight turning characteristics are important to me. I find when riding a Beta Rev3, tight turns are a breeze. The other modern bike I like to ride is the two stroke Scorpa, but it does not seem to have quite the same turning circle as the Beta.