Jump to content

woody

Members
  • Posts

    4,074
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by woody
 
 
  1. The parts you mention should be easy to find, carb was 25mm Amal originally but not really worth risking an old used one. Can be replaced with a 26mm Amal/Mikuni/OKO - Mid Atlantic trials have decent deals on OKO carbs. Gear change lever can be had new although used come up on ebay. You need one from a bike with the same side casing as yours which was fitted to all Sherpas from your model onwards, as earlier models have a wider bend for the different shaped clutch casing. Kickstarts again, new or used. Tank/seat unit may prove difficult, not sure if anyone in the States reproduces them, used come up on ebay but may need repair and sealing against ethanol fuel. Airboxes come up fairly often on ebay and the same one was used on the 71 onwards Sherpa to your model, also similar year Alpinas. The outlet to the carb needs to exit from the bottom left of the airbox, so that it clears the sidepanel of the tank/seat unit, not from top right. One from a same year Alpina should also fit. Brake pedal new or used, if used it needs to be from a model from '68 up to your model. Later pedals will fit if you're not bothered about original look. The rear hub was unique to your model and the one before it (124/125) and would be hard to find. A later hub from the next model onwards will fit with no mods other than a different length spacer might be needed (if you meant a brake plate rather than brake hub, a Pursang brake plate may fit as your model Sherpa hub was based on a Pursang one) As the previous poster said, Hugh's Bultaco should give you all the info you need. If you have to split the engine be aware that although gearbox and clutch internals may look the same, there are subtle differences between some models and later parts may not interchange with your crank cases in the case of gearbox, or mainshaft in the case of clutch hub and basket
  2. You had the order correct initially, there is no spacer between brake plate and swingarm The clearance is tight anyway, but the guard should fit although very close to the tyre so you will probably get some rub occasionally. Has the wheel been rebuilt with the wrong offset at some time maybe? What tyre is it? Looks like a Pirelli which is blown up quite hard? It may rub less with normal trials pressure
  3. The bushes and seals on Falcons are standard sizes so you can get them from most bearing stockists. You can use air to re-gas them using a mountain bike shock pump, it doesn't have to be nitrogen.
  4. There is also a very small seal that fits inside the final drive sleeve gear shaft, you need to replace that as well as the big one around the outside of the sleeve gear shaft. Also check the bush that sits between the seal and the gear shaft as these can get worn by debris underneath the seal which means there may no longer be a good contact between it and the ID of the seal. I don't think they're available new but remember if you have to get one made they need the recess on the inner side fo r the O ring Re; the broken bolt on the shock mount, drill a piece of bar in one end to fit over the protruding part and weld them together. The heat often helps free of the threads if they've corroded in and the leverage on the bar helps turn it. If it snaps off you're no worse off really as drilling out is the final option For info, you don't need a speedo fitted for an MOT, only required when actually using the bike on the road, so for the MOT you could just remove it
  5. Nice bike, I've got on myself to restore one day. Any reason you've routed the aircleaner hose to carb inside of the sidepanel instead of though the slot? (other than they're a bugger to fit...) Forgot to mention the J on the headstock. This type of stamping has been mentioned before in other topics but no-one seems certain of what they represent. None of my bikes have them so not present on all
  6. Footrests are Miller conversions as the originals are flat plate that don't fold. The rear brake pedal is probably a Miller mod as well, moving it to the inside which is where model 49 onwards pedals were located.The 27 had it behind the footrest as you say.
  7. If the key isn't a good fit in the slot, it can easily ride up the back of the slot when fitting the flywheel and this isn't always apparent when assembling, meaning that the flywheel isn't fully home on the shaft when tightened. As you say, best bet is to get a new key, loctite it in, let it set and then fit the flywheel. Most of the engines I've had have had some wear of the slot, so this is what I always do. These flywheels coming loose isn't uncommon if it isn't fitted perfectly The single sided weight is standard on the later 250, from M158 onwards I think. Earlier 250 had a double sided weight, as do the 350 models
  8. Just wondering why you think that.? The frame is probably an M91/92 series 2 but could be a 124/125 or 150/151 (250 and 325 from that era are the same visually so can't be told apart) Definitely not 158. The forks are M92 as is the chrome exhaust (which will bolt straight onto a 250 engine from '75 onwards)
  9. They're both fibreglass, Ossa only fitted fibreglass at the factory. Only UK bikes had alloy tanks. The MAR alloy tank is a different shape from the glass tank, the Gripper alloy tank is the same shape but the tank and side panel are seperate units on UK bikes and the tank didn't use the front fixing bolts
  10. You're never going to get an answer you can trust in 100%. If I was buying one I'd line it. A few years back I bought a tank for my 340 Sherpa and never got the chance to see if it was resistant or not as it split first time out along the seam where the upper and lower mouldings are joined (I think it was there anyway) The quality was poor and if held up to the light, looking through the filler cap hole you could see through the bottom in places, it was that thin. The quality of some repro parts isn't always good
  11. woody

    Bultaco M80

    They aren't engine mounts that have been removed, the lower front engine mount, where fitted (not on 5 speed trials engines) is central so where something has been removed is the wrong place for a front lower engine mount. It's possibly had case savers welded on at some point which may have been removed. Can't help with the upper mounts as I can't really see them from the pictures but the M80 doesn't have brackets there.It's nearly 50 years old so unless you know the history, previous owners could have fitted all manner of things. No idea what the G is, never seen that before, could signify the country it was exported to if not a UK bike originally?
  12. It's not a split washer, the two halves locate in the groove in the spline and sit behind the big weight which sits up against them when tightened up. They also double up for use with the tool to remove the taper as PMK's photos show They weren't used as a part in the MAR engine so I guess they must have been available along with the puller from Ossa agents. Before you try and remove it measure the length as there are three different lengths for these. You'll need to know which one if trying to source a replacement should it break
  13. woody

    Chain

    There is a Pursang one that will do the job https://www.inmotiontrials.com/product/pursang-mk11-chain-rubber-slipper/
  14. It's very difficult. This is only a suggestion as sometimes they come out, sometimes not. Remove the bushes from either side to allow more movement. Remove the timing cover, detach the spring from the tensioner arm and remove the pad, then you might just wriggle it out. What I did was take some off the end of the shaft on the timing side, either cut t or ground it can't remember, while still in the bike which made it a lot easier to get out. Because I'd lost enough length to drill another split pin hole I drilled and tapped the end of the shaft to 6mm so that when it went back in I fitted a bolt and penny washer instead of a split pin to stop it sliding through the bush. The same can be done to the other side once it's out but probably not necessary
  15. Your clutch case should look like this, you can see the plug underneath https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/Bultaco-Lobito-Pursang-Alpina-175-clutch-engine-case-cover-cap/172934687132?epid=7007483100&hash=item2843b5e99c:g:19UAAOSwnw9Z5~gd In your photo the original gearbox drain plug is the one behind the one you are pointing to, although I can't see that it has a drain bolt in it. The one you are pointing to is something that someone has added, maybe made their own gearbox drain if the original is damaged. I can't tell where exactly it's positioned but could also be a drain for the ignition should water get in there The casting on the other side is for a speedo drive which is a hangover from older engines. Thyey weren't used on later bikes, It's blank and isn't drilled
  16. There is only one place I know of that does them and they are a repro not NOS judging by the kinks in the bend - Frankie Mountain If yours is good enough have it re-chromed as at least you know it fits properly. Some pattern parts.... http://www.frankiemountain.com/en/compra/ossa-mick-andrews-exhaust-pipe-chrome-new-ossa-mar-exhaust-250cc-1421
  17. The UK 199a had an alloy tank. same as earlier models. The B had a different alloy tank unique to that model but it may have been supplied with the bike as an extra as there were many B models in UK with the plastic tank
  18. woody

    Cota 247

    4B was underneath but this is an UKR motor. Frame is MK1
  19. woody

    Cota 247

    Do you mean original type exhaust or original look for the bike? If exhaust, that should be easy enough as middle boxes and tail pipes appear on ebay fairly often. The best set up is from a mid 70s on Cota that uses middle and tail pipe and would have been what the Ulf Karson motor had. Nice and quiet If you mean original look for the bike, that's more tricky as would you match the look of the early bike that the frame is from or the later bike that the engine is from? To make it look like an early bike will take a lot and isn't worth it. Personally I wouldn't care as apart from many detail changes which aren't really noticeable, the look of the bikes barely changed from '72 to '76. with frame colour changes and a slimmer tank being the most obvious. The frame itself barely changed at all from MK1 to UKR apart from accommodating a right hand side rear brake lever in about '73. Yours looks to have been converted from l/h to r/h already. I think you have the best of the 247 engines with better power delivery and the slimmer casings plus clutch arm on top of casing which means they don't get caught by rocks as the earlier levers can situated underneath. You have the later hubs and yokes. If you can find a later, slimmer tank cover and alloy undertank from a '72 onwards bike, then with a silver/grey frame you'll have the appearance of a MK3, MK4 or MK4b bike or with a black frame you will have the appearance of a MK5 or UKR Cota First thing I'd do is sort the exhaust as it will make a difference to getting it running how it should, fit proper tyres and bars, decent grips levers and cables and concentrate on getting it to run right. Then do whatever with the appearance if you want to. I'd take off the alloy guards and replace with plastic as they won't last 5 minutes left on. Ok for show but not go. Last thing is the forks. I didn't look at the first photo above when I commented before as I remember the bike from ebay. However, on ebay the photo was of the other side, l/h side. Now I've looked at the one above, it has odd fork legs fitted. The r/h is from the early MK1 / MK2 bike whereas the l/h is from a MK3 onwards bike
  20. The usual consequence was the stop retaining bolt being ripped out of the casing as it was only a short bolt. The casing could end up in any degree of a mess. This was all a bit hush hush at the time and Honda did provide replacement engines as presumable it was recognised as a design fault. Mine was replaced. The design fix I belive was fitting a longer bolt. The only other fix is by welding depending on how bad the damage is. If weld repair is possible, if casing bits have gone into the gearbox they obviously can't be left there so stripping and clearing out would be necessary
  21. woody

    Cota 247

    You have a very early chassis from '68 if the number is correct with a much later engine, probably an UKR from '75/76. Wheels forks and yokes from later bike also. Exhaust has had the middle box removed and re-routed to exit where it is for whatever reason. Tank unit is the earlier type from the '68 - '72 range
  22. woody

    Bultaco Sherpa

    The B airbox attaches differently from the A airbox, so to fit one on the A frame the frame mountings need to be altered to suit the B mounting points. The B box intake is in the top and the rear A mounting point would sit right over the intake. The A sidepanel mounts also need to be removed but that's already don on this frame. I fitted one to my 198A, not sure if this link will work
  23. woody

    TX 300

    It was proper carbon but a one off made a friend of the owner
  24. I checked my Haynes and Clymer manuals this afternoon but neither give any measurements. I don't have an actual Bultaco manual but I'm fairly sure they are just parts diagrams rather than instructional
  25. Sherpas were fitted with four different hub types and there are quite a few more for other Bultacos. I'm not sure you'll find the tolerances / measurements you're looking for in a Bultaco manual, I don't think they were that detailed. You can find some online if you google Bultaco manual
 
×
  • Create New...