After reading the letter from 'Scottish Hopeful' in last weeks TMX, I kind of agreed with one or two of his points. In particular, "The bottom 20-30 of the entry automatically forefeiting their ride for the following year".
Pro's
It appears to make a bit of sense I suppose as the lucky wobblers that got a ride are forced to make room for next years SSDT hopefuls.
Cons
James Dabill missed a group in 2004 and was excluded for it. The bottom 30 finishers would say "I can't ride next year but neither can he, in fact I beat him this year ".
The SSDT would look very silly if riders of his calibre were not allowed to ride.
I have just read your response to 'Scottish Hopeful' in this weeks TMX and you say "It can't be much fun finishing so far down the entry after 6 days riding". Wrong! I finished 12th from the bottom last year and was very chuffed to have completed the course without getting lost (again), without killing the bike and without getting in anyone's way or wasting valuable resources like the 'Mountain Search & Rescue Team'
To say that these riders are taking an extended trail ride around the Highlands is a bit much The infamous 'SSDT in-betweeny-bits' are NOT a steady trail ride round. Well, not at wobbler level they aren't anyway...
PS
I don't expect you to reply but it would be reet grand if you did...