2stroke4stroke

According to the ACU, "Trials competitors may use any appropriate helmet". You may or may not find somewhere in the regs what they consider to be appropriate. As your pudding bowl is still entirely legal for use on the road I think it could be seen as appropriate - certainly more so than the bicycle helmets some trials competitors wear where the design level of protection (from a 12 mph blow) is exceeded if you fall over whilst stationary (12 mph being the speed your head would hit the ground in such a fall). Puts things in to perspective a bit.

"How many of these frames broke?" Every one that I have seen or seen a photo of. The downtubes crack just at the end of the gusset. You might get away with repairing a small crack if you catch it before it spreads but the problem would appear to be a combination of bad design and poor quality tubing. I had mine sleeved internally - not an easy job.

Looks a lot better than many I see. What exactly do you think might be wrong?

So you'll have a broken frame to look forward to sometime as well☺

You might be surprised how many thieves think there could be a few bob in some pipe cleaning gear.

I was going by appearance, the original matt "soft" bit seems to have gone in favour of an all shiny guard. I'll be more than happy to be wrong.

I was mightily impresssed when the first TRS appeared with a rear mudguard that could be tied in knots. That alone was a strong selling point but now they appear to have the same rubbish as everything else.

Because the SSDT now provides refuelling at intervals to suit the standard tanks (by and large). I remember having to buy a gallon and a half, I think, tank for my Suzuki to comply with the trial regs back in the days when petrol supply was a free for all but there was still the occasional filling station outwith the Fort. Indeed I can recall operating the hand- operated pump at Bridge of Gaur when the Club sent a team out to run it for the day as the old wifie who ran that, alongside the local shop/post office, would never have coped.

Reliability was never the Italjet's strong suit. Can't see age having improved that - I know people who still carry the psychological scars. But no doubt owners will be on soon.

I 've never been happy with the thought of subjecting alloy bars to the prolonged stress of compressing the forks using hooks on the bars. But I'm old enough to remember when alloy bars were felt to be too easily bent and indeed subject to fracture.

The somewhat obvious best way to do this would be to remove the additional flywheel weight and fit a 200 top end. Perhaps not as expensive as you might think - I know at least one dealer keeps refurbished barrels in stock to exchange when needed. If you can locate such a barrel for a 200 then you're made. Or try a breaker.

Having the snail cams equal does not always mean that the wheel is in correct alignment. Sight along the chain and see if that looks straight. It's sometimes necessary to compromise on alignment with a trials bike due to the effects of poor build quality and/or bending of components over the years.

Long after people had stopped riding such things there, Paul Jackson (if I remember the name corrrectly) rode a rather special C15 in the SSDT. It had two rear sprockets and he removed links for the roadwork. A bit fiddly but probably worth it for the distances involved.

If that's what you have insured it as then you'll be in dead trouble if you get involved in a claim and they discover it does not have sixteen inch wheels and legshields?

I'ts not the first choice perhaps but, from experience, I wouldn't rule it out.

I'd be checking the Woodruff key.

You are completely changing one part of the combustion equation - something is bound to be affected, in this case the lower end of the "carburetion". Presumably the ECU needs to be told that the compression has changed?

The answer's at number 17 here ? Kickstarting

Wouldn't have stopped someone else trying to claim it though?

It certainly should be a slicker process but your opinion might be different if you were on the other end of such a situation. A pal was once grateful for the thoroughness of DVLA over a bike he owned when someone who had come across an old mudguard at a jumble was trying to use possession of that old number plate as the basis for claiming ownership of the bike.

If you're in the UK and don't have formal proof of year (and more besides) you aren't going to be registering it tomorrow.

Indeed, my written log (which never stops working) tell me what I have been doing so I can work out near enough.

I've had two (inexpensive) - neither lasted long enough to be of any practical use. I'm not convinced time alone means much on a trials bike. i prefer to look back on what events I have done and assess how they may have, for instance, affected the oil. Two hours putting round a field doing sections is not the same as two hours spent blasting over the moors.

Is George Greenland not still in possession of this? Not sure if he still rides it.

Probably as easy just to get a wee loop welded on?